The FMCSA designed the imminent CSA 2010 initiative to put some teeth into its safety enforcement efforts, but many motor carriers fear the new program, at least in its current form, may gnaw away at the vitality of the freight industry.
As you know, CSA 2010 entails the Safety Measurement System (SMS) which will replace SafeStat; CSA 2010 is slated to roll out nationally 12/12/2010. However, on Tuesday, the National Association of Small Trucking Companies, The Expedite Alliance of North America and the Air & Expedited Motor Carriers Association, asked a federal appeals court to block the implementation of CSA 2010 or, at the very least, to stay the publication of its safety ratings (see full story) until the FMCSA completes a rulemaking process that complies with the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Unlike the current SafeStat program, the SMS impacts a carrier’s safety rating and assigns safety scores to carriers and drivers. Moreover, SMS data would become available to the public.
It is difficult to dispute the FMCSA’s bolstered efforts – who doesn’t want safer roadways? We need to ensure carriers and drivers are capable of safely traversing our highways, suburban streets and side roads. But the accuracy of the data itself is in dispute. And some believe that publishing this data will wreck havoc on a struggling industry.
CSA 2010 features a BASIC scoring system (Behavior Analysis Safety Improvement Categories) and uses the following seven categories to calculate safety scores:
- Unsafe Driving (i.e. speeding, improper lane change)
- Fatigued Driving (i.e. Hours-Of-Service violations, crash reports)
- Driver Fitness (i.e. lack of training, medical issues)
- Controlled Substances, Alcohol (i.e. misuse of medication)
- Vehicle Maintenance (i.e. mechanical defects)
- Cargo-Related (i.e. spilled cargo, unsecured loads)
- Crash Indicator (i.e. patterns of crash involvement)
But what are the formulas used to develop these scores? Perhaps more importantly, is the playing field level? For example, some states just need “probable cause” to charge a moving violation and carriers that are required to maintain driving logs will be compared with those that are not required to do so. Most logging violations involve recordkeeping errors, not excess driving time. Will data be deceiving? And if data needs to be corrected, can carriers and drivers rely on a fair and satisfactory process?
The filing associations contend that the public release of data will have an anticompetitive effect on the industry. Additionally, shippers and brokers may be liable for “negligent selection” of a motor freight provider as public data easily becomes evidence in a trial. CSA 2010 may also result in a driver exodus. Some predict a 10 percent decrease in truck drivers as CSA 2010 data renders some operators unemployable. And as we know, less drivers means tighter capacity.
The filed motion states, “While the public undoubtedly has an interest in safe highways, it also has an interest in a competitive motor carrier industry, especially in these economic times. A program that decreases competition, reduces jobs, and increases transportation costs, is not in the public interest. Implementation of CSA 2010 in its current form threatens the survival of thousands of carries, many of which are small companies in rural America.”
The associations say they want the FMSCA to comply with the APA which entails notice-and-comment provisions that would allow interested parties to comment on the proposal before final rule. The FMSCA did invite comments on its proposal, and made modifications accordingly (see <a href="story“>full story), but it did not provide full disclosure regarding all aspects of the proposed rule, namely, aspects surrounding the data.
This is a difficult issue to navigate. As transportation industry professionals, and drivers and passengers, we need to do all we can to ensure safe roads. But how will CSA 2010 affect our industry and our economy? What are your thoughts?



